How Quickly We Forget

Military/War, Politics, Society/Culture

“Congress is presumed to know the terrain against which it legislates… If Congress can appropriate billions for this aspect of national defense and not know how it is accounted for, then God save the Republic.” - Chief Justice Mayer - U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Today’s veterans enjoy unprecedented care and support, but we have not always offered previous generations of veterans all of the support that we indeed owe them. How quickly we forget that if not for their sacrifices, we’d speaking German or saluting the Rising Sun.

The Korean war was called the Forgotten War because it was sandwiched between and overshadowed by the dual traumas of WWII and Vietnam. We forget that in three years of fighting in Korea, we lost nearly 37,000 men. Contrast that with 4,000 dead in Iraq,  the 10,000 or so casualties since September of 2001 or even the 58,000 U.S. servicemen killed in Vietnam over 10 years. Korean War vets served just as valiantly as any generation of soldiers. They sacrificed heavily; indeed proportionately even more so than present-day veterans, but while Presidential candidates dangle free college tuition, fewer, shorter deployments and cutting-edge medicine in front of today’s veterans, most of these retirees have been forgotten, as have many of their brethren who served in WWII and the broken the promises that were made to them in return for their service.

Master Sergeant Floyd Sears is but one of these forgotten vets. He served his country proudly in the Air Force during both Vietnam and Korea from 1951 until he retired with an honorable discharge in 1971. He is representative of an entire generation of loyal veterans who served their country honorably until retirement, yet were quite literally stripped of their health care benefits by Congress. He belongs to the Military Retiree Grass Roots Group (MRGRG); an organization of military retirees who are actively trying to persuade Congress to restore that broken promise before these men are all dead.

During WWII and the Korean War, recruiters promised military recruits –at the behest of the military leadership– that they and their eligible dependents would receive free health care for life at military health care facilities if they served honorably for 20 years. This promise had never been ratified nor acquiesced to by Congress, but they funded the retirees’ health care for decades. In 1956, the first law covering military health care was written, but it excluded retirees. Despite this, the promise of free medical care continued to be made with the full knowledge and blessing of the military leadership until at least the early 1990s.

Beginning in the late 80s and into the 1990s, numerous base closures were conducted. Along with the base closures, military medical facilities were also closed, stressing an already burdened system. Priority was given to active duty personnel and retirees were essentially shut out of their own medical system. When I was being treated for my injuries, I personally met retirees who were made to wait months for their appointments, traveled burdensome distances at their own expense, in some cases having to spend the night in another city just to get treatment. And just as in the civilian world, change was needed in medicine. Thus in the 1990s, TriCare was born. TriCare was the military version of the HMO and was designed to fix the service deficiencies in military medicine. But it wasn’t the answer. Retirees over 65 who were eligible for Medicare were not eligible for TriCare but could retain their previous space-available coverage if they signed up for Medicare. As a practical matter, even less space was available then before at military facilities and the waits for retirees over 65 became even longer. Many were forced to retain private insurance or purchase Medicare Part B supplements if they wished to maintain any standard of care.  And thus the promise that this country made to take care of an entire generation of veterans was broken.

The issue was litigated in federal court in 2002’s Schism vs. United States. The court found that the promise of free health care for life was in fact extended to these veterans in good faith and that the government acknowledged such promises and funded the care. But on appeal, it was determined that the recruiters and their superiors who blessed the promotion of this benefit were acting without statutory authority and thus were not bound to keep the promise. The Supreme Court has decided to step clear of this minefield and has refused to review the lower court’s ruling. This leaves one final remedy for this breach of contract and that is for Congress to change the law allowing these men to collect that which they fought so valiantly for. But since that figure is in the tens of billions of dollars and the decision affects so many –nearly 1.5 million veterans who entered service before 1956 and were 65 or older by 1995– the odds are stacked against them.

The history of this case is clear. These men were promised free, lifetime health care for them and their eligible dependents after 20 years of service. That promise was still being made as late as 1992. Their acceptance of that offer and the government’s funding and provision of those benefits created an implied, in-kind contract. That contract was then breached and the government is using arcane federal regulations to dodge its responsibility.

A man is only as good as his word. These men are leaving us at an alarming rate. The least we could do is to provide the care that was promised to those who defend our freedoms. We owe them that. As a nation, if we cannot keep our promises to the very patriots whose sacrifices and blood debts ensure our continued freedom and survival, then as Chief Justice Mayer noted, God save our Republic.

On this Labor Day as you contemplate the fruits of your own labor, email your congressman and Senators and demand justice for these men.

Read more about Schism vs. United States

Bookmark and Share With Friends: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Webnews
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Ask
  • Bloglines
  • blogmarks
  • Blue Dot
  • Facebook
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Hype
  • Live-MSN
  • Netscape
  • Netvouz
  • Newstube
  • NewsVine
  • RawSugar
  • Readster
  • Rojo
  • Simpy
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • VoteForIt
  • YahooMyWeb
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • SphereIt

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

25 Responses

  1. Many thanks to Jayme Evans for writing the “How Quickly We Forget” article. It is very well written and is very accurate.

  2. ROBERT V. SMOAK, SR.  •  September 1, 2008 @5:38 pm

    Thank you so very much for writing this article and including MSG Floyd Sears name and involvement in this worthy but floundering cause. I am also a member of the MRGRG and have tried for several years, along with a host of others, to educate the Congress on this problem and the GREATEST SWINDLE OF ALL TIME!! We have been close to successful several different years because numberous Congressmen agreed to be co-sponsors of some bills that would have given us what we were promised - BUT we found out that was all they did, i.e. co-sponsor. None of them to my knowledge ever stood up to fight to get any of these bills out of Committee and voted on. Congress is just waiting for those of us who received this promise to die off - then they won’t have to be bothered by us anymore.

    ROBERT V. SMOAK, LT. COL., USAF RETIRED
    US NAVY ENLISTED YEOMAN 3C, 1946-1949
    US NAVAL ACADEMY MIDSHIPMAN, 1949-1953
    US AIR FORCE OFFICER, 1953-1981

  3. Norman Campbell  •  September 1, 2008 @5:39 pm

    I retired in 1964 after 22 years of in the military - a veteran of WWII, Korea and a member of the “advisory group” sent to Vietnam in 1962. I not only believed the promise of free life time health care, as an NCO I followed instructions from my commanders to make the promise of free life time health care to many of those under me the military wanted to keep in the service. Keeping these young individuals in the military saved the American taxpayers billions of dollars in recruiting and training costs.
    In 1995 I woke up in an intensive care unit after a heart attack only to learn that I had been kicked out of the military health care system with only Medicare to cover the costs of hospitalization. Bitter? You bet!
    Congress knew the promise was being made and did nothing to stop what essentially is fraud. This is a crime committed by the US Government and a stain of disgrace on the honor and integrity of the very government we all gave the best years of our lives to protect..

  4. Robert (Bob) Thompson  •  September 1, 2008 @6:11 pm

    A reunion is being planned for the Military Retiree Grass Roots Group (MRGRG) and the Class Action Lawsuit Group (CAG), and several of their supporters. The Event dubbed “2009 MRGRG/CAG OLD TIMERS BASH”, will take place (tentative dates) March 5-7, 2009 in Panama City Florida. One Night will feature a Reception, a Ceremony, a Dinner and a Dance, in an up scale Hotel and the next night will be at a Veterans Post, in Honor of the unsung Hero’s. Retired Colonel George (Bud) Day and several MRGRG Members, including Floyd Sears will be present. Details are being worked out as I write this missive.

  5. Willard D. Gray  •  September 1, 2008 @6:24 pm

    Dear Mr. Evans. A good and great article but one in which we are just singing to the choir.

    Floyd Sears has worked tirelessly 24/7 on this “promise” of lost health care for some ten years. I did assist in my meager way, but the gains he did achieve, i.e., TRICARE for Life for those over age 65, are not appealing to providers in my region.

    Me. I am a 1964, i.e., 1964, U.S. Army length of service military retiree who was BETRAYED along with 432,000 cohorts when congress changed a decades old law regarding how retired pay would be paid in the future after we had done our time on the “low” draft-era pay and non-existent allowances. Consequently we have endured a gross retired pay discrimination varying from 1/3 – ½ or more throughout the 25 pay grades.

    As a member of a retired pay suit which went all the way to the Supreme Court they “quickly” said, “Congress can do what they want to do with the military.” This pay discrimination I’ve endured for over 46 years.

    Medicare did not even exist when I retired. I knew that under the”law” which I had served that I had “earned” life-time health care. No!

    In the ‘70s this same deceitful, thankless and unforgiving nation notified ;me that on attaining age 65 when no longer subject to recall to active duty and wanting any health care, “Go to Social Security and apply for Medicare part B” along with the draft-dodger and highly paid civilian. So,

    for 31 years I have paid; part, most or currently all of the health care for my wife of over 60 years and myself. Mary served with General George S. Patton’s Third Army Field Hospital as a captain nurse in France, Germany, and Austria. Prior to that good duty she was buzz-bombed on merry old England. What an Honor?????

    Presently in the mail for delivery by September 4 is my personal check to BC/BS for some $840.00 for two months coverage of my wife and myself. This is in addition to the monthly Medicare payments.

  6. Robert Nettles  •  September 1, 2008 @6:38 pm

    Not only were the veterans of WWII and Korea short changed those of us who entered the military in the early 1960s were made the same promise and are having the same problems that our counterparts are having today.

    I guess the time and energy we put into our military carriers means nothing to the Congress of these United States. The long deployments, the hazardous duty that some of us took part in to insure that the United States remained one of the safest and freest countries in the world has meant nothing. So we pay for Medicare and fight to keep what Tricare insurance we can, but it is far from the free medical treatment for life that we were promised and then denied.

    There is going to come a time when these young veterans are going to need the same care that we do now and I am afraid that nothing will be there for them.

    I wish to thank Mr. Jayme Evans for his effort in writing this article and bringing the truth out in the open as we have been trying to do for years.

  7. Benjamin Summers Jr.  •  September 1, 2008 @7:27 pm

    I wonder what the great war heroe running for President of our great country will do if he is elected. I wonder what his voting record has been, to try and correct this grave injustice to those that gave the flower of their youth in service to their Country.
    SgtMajRet USMC

  8. David Smith  •  September 1, 2008 @10:30 pm

    I to would like to thank Jayme for a well written hard hitting article on the lose of health care for the military retiree. Him and others like him desereve the respect and grattiude of all military retirees. Thank you

  9. Ed Lawton, USAF-ret.  •  September 2, 2008 @5:41 am

    A very good commentary, factually accurate and a sad commentary that our nation quickly forgets those who serve in order to accommodate the agendas of contemporary legislators who never served and fail to understand the meaning, when giving their word to those who selflessly sacrifice for the nation.

    One slight addendum to this commentary. The identical promise addressed by Floyd Sears, was also made throughout the Cold War and was only ceased in the mid-1990’s when Congress legislatively significantly changed the earned, health care entitlements of military retirees and invented a completely new military HMO program that allowed more liberal disbursement of American tax dollars to accommodate illegal alien health care.

    Men and women serving up to and even into the 21st Century were also denied the exact, identical promises made to them when they joined the military in the ’60’s, ’70s and ’80s like their brothers in the 40’s and 50’s.

  10. Jim Ret  •  September 2, 2008 @6:27 am

    We are losing members of WW II and Korea at the rate of over 1000 a day. Many of them will go to their graves feeling that, after giving their all for the country, the country has turned its back on them.
    We continue to fight to right these wrongs while insuring that future generations do not face the same snubs.
    Thanks Jayme for a fine article and thanks to Floyd Sears for his dedication to bringing to light the “greatest swindle”.
    I will pass this on to my e-mail list and hope others will do the same

  11. Art Davis  •  September 2, 2008 @7:05 am

    Dear Mr. Evans, thank you so much for what you have done. Our history suggests that we “Walk softly but carry a big stick. Well I say, that it is time for us Retiries to Shout Loudly and carry a big Club.
    Art Davis EN1(SS) Retired

  12. Ted Cook  •  September 2, 2008 @7:11 am

    Thank you for an accurate, well written article. Now…if only somebody who could do something about it would read and heed.
    I served in the AirForce from 1953 through 1975, at wages just above the poverty level, and based at least part of my decision to stay the course, on my belief that my dependents and I would not have to worry about health care costs as long as I lived. That was the promise made to me when I enlisted and through out my military career. After all, it was my government that said so, and we never doubted it for a moment..We all know what happened then….. an anti military president, and non caring Congress, decided that it was costing to much to keep their word … and after all , who needed a lot of old men and women who were past their prime anyway. The sooner they died off the better… then there would be no problem.

    Finally, after much letter writing , phone calls, and telegrams from the MRGGG, led in large measure by Floyd Sears, Jim Whittington, Jean Beard, and Retired Brig General Bob Clements, in 2002 we were thrown a bone with tri care for life. This helped, but falls far short of fulfilling the promise that was made to us that we in good faith relied on. We kept our part of the bargain …but the government has reneged on its part.

    Ted L Cook MSgt USAF Ret.

  13. Garry Hailey  •  September 2, 2008 @7:48 am

    A good article; but alas only one of many lies; broken promises; conspiracies; obstruction of justice and anything else that the United States Government can do to crush the poor and weak; especially their own people. They take; not give. When you go to war; it is far better to die on foreign soil than to return to be kicked as a dog in your own country. I’ve written two books unpublished as of yet about my dealings with the Veterans Administration. I believe I cannot get my records that I need to prove my case unless I level a conspiracy to obstruct Justice charges on all Government personnel from my now re-opening of case to first filing in 1992. They thrive on adverse publicity; not like an honest person. It is truly remarkable the comparision of this countries leaders to the leaders of the Roman Empire. All down through recorded history nothing has changed except the names. The Constituition they hold so dear; they ratify at a whim to make new laws to get them out of trouble. Enough, I don’t want to even think of them anymore; “Render respect to whom respect is due” liars thieves and murderers do not have my respect nor my fear, only my prayers that they will see their sins and beg God for forgiveness before it is to late, and change their evil ways. “You cannot serve Mammon and God , for you will love one and hate the other”. Another famous quote that will convict so many; “It would be easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than a rich man to heaven”. I know this one won’t be selected for anything but the shredder, but that doesn’t bother me; no one wants to see the truth anyway.

  14. Robert E. Clampit, Sr SCPO, USN Ret  •  September 2, 2008 @7:55 am

    I retired frrom the US Navy 16 Aug 78 after 24-8-12 and during much of that time I had the collateral duty as a career conselor. One of the thongs I always stressed was the “free medical” promised after we retired. The attitude of the Congress is to talk about it and promise to rectify the situation, until they are re-elected and then all is forgotten.

    It appears that their reasoning is,”what have you done for us lately.

  15. Jean D. Beard  •  September 2, 2008 @10:41 am

    Dear Jayme,

    I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart. My late husband was a military retiree (ret. 1968), USAF. He also was made the promise of, If you will give the US Armed Forces the very best twenty (20) years of your life, we in turn will provide you and your eligible dependents NO FEE medical care for the rest of your life. If you should pass away first, we will continue that medical care to your surviving spouse as long as she lives or until she remarries.

    I have been in this fight for about 10, you have done a great service to all of us by writing this most accurate article and getting it out to the public. Isn’t it a crying shame that these men and woman that served in the military and fought for their county, still are in a FIGHT to regain the promise. I do hope that everyone that reads your piece, understands that we are not speaking of all veterans, only the ones that gave up so much to serve their country. I am in no way talking down to the vets that chose not to make it a career, that was their choice and I thank them for their service.

    All Military Retirees are Veterans but not all Veterans are Military Retirees. This is what we have been trying to get across to the U. S. Congress. So many of them do not understand as they did not serve. When the words Military Retiree are presented they immediately think of all veterans. Then they decide that would be too expensive. If we could only get it across to each and everyone of them, perhaps they would “Keep the Promise”. I again thank you for helping us get this atrocity out to the public.

    Someone in the group referred to the debt owed to these men and women as being “A part of the National Debt”, I agree.

    Sincerely,
    Jean
    Jean D. Beard
    Surviving Spouse of: Wiley M. Beard (USAF Ret.)
    Member:
    Military Retiree Grass Roots Group (MRGRG) FL-11
    Disabled American Veterans (DAV) Lifetime Member
    National Association for Uniformed Services (NAUS)
    http://mrgrg-ms.org/ or http://mrgrg-ms.org/briefing-c.pdf

  16. Richard E. Poe  •  September 2, 2008 @10:52 am

    My period of service in the Navy started in 1947 as a USNR. Then to active duty with broken service over a period of 22 years retiring as RMC in 1974. Your article is very encouraging to me and to all retirees and veterans. Joan and I had to experience a great deal of uncertainty after turning 65, trying to keep up with supplementary insurance premiums for medicare. The comments already written and your article say it much more elequently than I ever could. Thank you for bring this to the surface! Let’s keep it there!

  17. Michelle Petersen  •  September 2, 2008 @1:35 pm

    I joined in 1984 and was promised by my recruiter YN1 Billy Brown out of San Diego that I wouyld have FREE MRDICAL AND DENTAL after 20 years of honorable service. What a BIGGGGGG LIE that was.

    ABHC (RET) Petersen

  18. Edgar Allen  •  September 2, 2008 @1:48 pm

    Dear Jayme,
    Thanks for the wonderful article. Floyd Sears is to be commended for the time and effort he has applied to this project.I am a member of Military Retiree Grass Roots Group (MRGRG) and participated in the March on Washington, DC. McCain was one of the speakers at that event and I assumed he was there for the sole purpose of supporting us. I am not aware of anything that he did to support our cause and do not believe he will support us if elected President & Commander-In-Chief.

    I spent 24 years in the Army from 1948 to Retiring in 1973. As an Enlisted Man I performed as Career Counselor and made many promises to individuals that if they reenlisted they and their dependents would receive free medical care for life. Also, after I received my commission I served as unit recruiting officer. My last assignment was at the Montgomery AFEES, Gunter AFB, AL as the Joint Processing Officer and Commanding Officer. Until my retirement in June 1973 these promises were still being made.
    Edgar Allen, Major, USA, Retired

  19. Gerard Bergeron  •  September 2, 2008 @2:18 pm

    We might need to march on Washington DC again to get those who make these laws understand that we will not take this bait & switch treatment.

    We signed up thinking we would have health care for life for our spouses and children under age 23 if in college. Now Congress is changing its mind.

    I suggest that if the next bunch of Senators or Congress persons want to serve in Washington They need to serve at least 3 years in the uniformed services so the might better understand the life of our people who give so much while others don’t have to fight for all American’s freedoms.

    I also suggest that Retired Veterans be paid out of the General funds not out of DOD so there is no more confusion.

    How do we tell those young folks that might make the military a career if the US Government will not honor its promises? We can not allow the US Goverment to lie them, so they can continue to lie to the next generation of Veterans. as they are doing to us. They say that they do not have the money to pay for our hard work and times spent away from our loved ones ,over many years.

    “Freedom is Not Free,” seems only a few will die or be disabled for the rest of America to live the “American dream!” This must not continue So Help US God!

  20. Gary Piel, CMS, USAF(1955-1981), Retired  •  September 2, 2008 @3:36 pm

    Thanks so much, Jayme for a well written hard hitting article on the loss of health care for the military retiree. Also much thanks to Floyd Sears for all his tireless efforts to this endeavor. Jayme, Floyd, and others like them desereve the respect and grattiude of all military retirees. Now, if only the Congess will do something to rectify this injustice. I have sent many letters myself. Thank you.

  21. Chaplain (retired) B. David Hodge  •  September 2, 2008 @5:14 pm

    Well I made my first enlistment in 1971, and was given the same promises. (Viet Nam era) Today I can only have my Tricare if I pay for medicare up front. For my wife and I we can afford it, but what about my brothers and sisters in arms who cannot. Yet government officials who never served in the military a day get plush treatment at Bethesda, and Walter Reed for them selves and their families, as a Veteran, we are told there is no room at the inn.

    Thanks for supporting our cause and keeping our plight out in the public eye.

    BDH
    Chaplain US Army (Retired)
    Viet Nam, Desert Shield/Storm, Bosnia

  22. Harold D. Carr, CSM Ret.  •  September 2, 2008 @7:43 pm

    Memories from a letter pleading for coverage and I doubt there will be coverage on the up coming Rally But thanks to all that are trying, Harold Carr

    Mr. Brokaw:

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 99-1402, WILLIAM O. SCHISM and ROBERT REINLIE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v., UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, DECIDED: November 18, 2002, has decided that it is OK for the United States Government to make then break a contract with its Military Retirees.

    This decision was wrong!

    You have done so much to help the service Men and Women, Please consider reporting once again in our behalf to help us correct this grave injustice.

    Military Retiree Rally
    which will take place at the
    U.S. Supreme Court, in Washington, DC,
    on 12 Feb 2003

    Web Site: http://www.classact-lawsuit.com
    http://www.classact-lawsuit.com/classnews.html

    Our generation got us where we are today, We trusted our commanders and our Government. We accepted all changes with out argument, we went were we were told without question. We wouldn’t be caught dead protesting, we were never political, we believed that with 20 years service we would receive Free Health Care for the rest of our life.

    Our Commanders told us so. Our units were awarded certificate for the highest reenlistment and we used the benefits as an inducement for enlistment’s.

    No one would have doubted the lawfulness of a military pamphlet or the word of a Commissioned Officer or the promise made by the American Government.

    We would have stopped anyone from bad mouthing the Government or the Commander In Chief or my immediate Commander.

    That was another time and another place, where a person and our Government could be trusted, we loved American and Freedom for All.

    We don’t know this Generation today, the politician that will say anything to get elected. A Commander that want stand up for his men for what is right. Department of Justice, to define the Government’s justice as a ’win’ on any basis possible.

    An Appeals Court that rationalize to bend the law.

    “While Congress has legislated extensively in the realm of military health care, as the history above indicates, not once has it statutorily authorized the secretaries of the military departments to contract with recruits for health benefit entitlements.

    Congress Did Not Subsequently Ratify Full Free Lifetime Medical Care for Retirees By Enacting Annual Appropriations for the Armed Services

    Because we hold neither 5 U.S.C. § 301, nor any other asserted authority, authorizes the recruiters’ promises of free lifetime medical care, the retirees can prevail only if the promises were later ratified by Congress. We hold that Congress did not ratify them.”

    This should have been the verdict and with the persistent of Col. Day, I am sure the out come of the Supreme Court will be ruled that, free health care was mandated by congress if for no other reason the fact that they did nothing to stop what the courts call fraudulent contracts.

    PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge, dissenting.

    It is with a genuine sense of sadness that I join Chief Judge Mayer’s dissent. I fully agree with his conclusion that the Government has deprived these retired veterans of their rights to the promised medical care. My sadness is not occasioned by any flaw in his well-reasoned and carefully-researched opinion. His clear and concise opinion demonstrates that the law is at least as much in the veteran claimants’ favor as the opposite opinion, to which a majority of the court subscribes, argues to the contrary.
    What is sad is that once again this court in dealing with the veterans matters entrusted to us places an ability to parse statutes and rules in the Government’s favor above the more fundamental obligation to apply the law, when the issue is an open one, in favor of the veteran. The Supreme Court has stated that obligation in terms of “the canon that provisions for benefits to members of the Armed Forces are to be construed in the beneficiaries’ favor.” King v. St. Vincent’s Hosp., 502 U.S. 215, 221 n.9 (1991) (citations omitted). The Court cited that canon specifically to point out that, in the case before it, even if the statutory construction on which it relied was undercut by other statutes, the canon nevertheless would have required the Court to read the statute in the veteran’s favor. The weight of the canon was again reaffirmed in Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 117-18 (1994).
    The canon expresses the Court’s understanding of and appreciation for the contribution that the military services make to the free society we so willingly enjoy, and the obligations that the society has taken upon itself, equally willingly, in exchange for that contribution. What I find most troubling is the insistence by the Government, represented before us by the Department of Justice, to define the Government’s justice as a ’win’ on any basis possible. I find this troubling in the instant case even without reference to the special status of veterans. Abraham Lincoln said, and indeed it is engraved on the front of our courthouse, that “it is as much the duty of government to render prompt justice against itself, in favor of citizens, as it is to administer the same, between private individuals.”
    Perhaps the problem is that, with the demise of compulsory military service, too few of our citizens today have the experience of knowing firsthand what the military is about. When an individual, at the behest of the government acting through its authorized representatives, devotes essentially his or her productive lifetime to the defense of the rest of us, undertakes training that itself is inherently more dangerous than the typical civilian occupation, and stands ready to go in harm’s way so that others need not, it ill behooves us‹either the Executive or the Judiciary‹to display the kind of public ingratitude that this case does. In my lifetime what peace we have enjoyed in this country has been the result not of yielding to threats, not of the diplomats’ vague and hollow promises easily broken, but of the ability of this country to display military might and to use it effectively when all else fails. I see nothing to suggest that that will not be the case during the lifetimes of our children and grandchildren.
    It is appropriate for the citizens of this country to be grateful to those who have given their lives to defend the country, and to those who are prepared to follow in that noble tradition. Congress in its legislation throughout our history has established a clear policy of national recognition for those who serve. When the law, to which we judges owe our first allegiance, is essentially in equipoise, as I believe the case to be here, we are free‹indeed, it is our obligation‹to invoke the principle that underlies the canon the Supreme Court has given us, and thus to arrive at a result that is in accord with the mandate of our forebears: “Justice, Justice Shalt Thou Pursue.”

    Thanking you in advance for any media coverage you can give.

    Harold D. Carr CSM, USA Ret.

  23. Bob Record  •  September 3, 2008 @3:23 am

    Thanks for remenbering not only those retirees who were forgotten but the men who have continued the fight for promised healthcare. We are not through yet. Don’t quit now.

    Bob

  24. ALAN ADELMAN  •  September 3, 2008 @5:36 am

    After reading thecomments, and from many distinguist individuals, it is a disgrace & deplorable action being taken by the Government when it comes to Retiree’s Benefits. The lack of Compassion & the total disregard and respect towards Retirees and after serving the Country honorbly that Congress treats us as “Second Class Citizens” is not and should not be acepted. These congressmen need to serve in the Military before they can run for any Public Office.

  25. George F. Fletcher  •  September 3, 2008 @2:23 pm

    I served in the USAF from February 1954 to October 1975. During those years it was just plain fact that our “Government” told us time after time that serving at least 20 years would get us free medical and dental care for the rest of our lives. Evidently that “Government” was not our Government in Washington, D.C. - Just a bunch of smoke and mirrors by the bean counters residing there. No one in Washington has the guts to really disavowal the facts, but neither will anyone step forward and correct this insult to the contracts fulfilled by those who served

    MSgt George F. Fletcher, USAF, Retired

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free